Showing posts with label lolcats. Show all posts
Showing posts with label lolcats. Show all posts

Friday, September 04, 2009

Weekend Assignment #283: Major Purchase

I have good news for a change, and that's the inspiration for our latest Weekend Assignment.
Weekend Assignment: #282: What was your most recent major purchase, that is, of a durable good worth $400 or more? (Yes, cars and houses count.) Was it something you researched and agonized over for weeks and months, or did you go through the whole buying process in an hour or a day?
Extra Credit: Are you generally an impulse buyer, or do you prefer to take lots of time to consider your options?
This question comes about partly as an excuse for me to tell you my personal news of the day. After three months of bureaucratic delay and confusion (mostly theirs rather than mine) about what unemployment compensation I'm due, if any, how to apply and whether it will actually be paid once approved, the State of Arizona's Department of Economic Security finally approved payment on my third or fourth attempt at a current unemployment claim. The money should hit my state-issued debit card next week for filings from the second week in June onward. That being the case, we were able to replace our only television set, which died the death a just under a week ago. No picture. No channel changing. No audio save for an electronic buzz. Kaput. Now with a couple thousand dollars coming in, we can at least partly pay my dad back for the car repair and still manage to buy a reasonable quality tv at Costco. This one:

hdtv2684
Couldn't get a decent picture at night without the flash, because of the
contrast between dark console and bright screen.

It's not the largest of the HD television sets Costco had on display, but it's not the smallest, either. In fact it's several inches shorter than the Magnavox, although it's also wider. It also cost about the same as the Magnavox did, all those years ago.

hdtv2689
Da box. Note the obscure brand name.

This purchase originated when the old tv failed last weekend, but the bulk of the process happened today (Friday). I did a little research into used televisions on Monday (mostly on Craigslist), and left a voicemail at a used tv and repair shop. They never called back, and it soon became clear that John wanted to hold out for a new one, even if it meant waiting for my unemployment situation to be resolved. So all this week our computers were our tv sets, including the Commodore 64 monitor in the bedroom.

But when the money was finally listed on the DES website as "Electronic payment" instead of "unresolved issue," we decided not to wait any longer. John, who had already scoped things out at Costco a couple of days ago, read reviews online while I went in to work at the church office this afternoon. Then we went to Costco, considered several different models and spoke to a sales person. I was initially taken with a Panasonic, but ultimately we settled on Costco's top seller, a Vizio 32 inch, LCD-based tv with 1920 x 1080 pixel Hi-Def resolution. No plasma, not a huge screen, no famous brand name as a dubious promise of reliability. But we ultimately decided that given the modest price, it would be silly to not get HD, and feel compelled to buy yet another tv when I get a full-time job.

All in all, this purchase represented a blending of John's buying habits and mine. John likes to read up on what's available, think over all the possibilities, including not buying anything at all, and work himself up to spending the money. I like to research as quickly as possible, possibly even just looking in a single store and asking questions. Once I have the idea that a particular model will do what I want, I see no point in delaying, assuming I have the money to spend. I want to walk out with the thing, then and there. In this instance, John had already done a lot of research over a period of time, and the fact that we had no access to broadcast or cable tv for a week, plus a sudden infusion of long-delayed money, pushed him to cut the mulling over phase of the operation short!

How about you? Did you spend months pondering the purchase of your car, your house, your computer or what-have-you, or did you make a snap decision and go with it? Do you suffer from buyer;s remorse afterward? Tell us about it in your blog, and please, please include a link back to this entry. I'll be back next Friday night with a roundup of your responses. Like this!

For Weekend Assignment # 282: I CAN HAZ LOLCATS?, I asked you to design a LOLcat (or LOLdog or whatever), one of those cute pictures with humorous captions in fractured English that are frequently seen on the Web. These are to be seen in situ on people's blogs, not excerpted here, but here's what we've got:

Florinda's dog Gypsy has a request for Santa, and later goes fishing.

Julie's cat is a Basement Cat, with peculiar ideas on how to be helpful.

Mike brings us the comments of a bird and a squirrel. No moose. Sorry.

That's it for now! Many thanks to Florinda, Julie and Mike for their LOLentries. If you're reading this (and you are), I hope you'll follow their example, and jump in with your own Weekend Assignment entry. Here are the guidelines if you'd like to participate:

  1. Please post your entry no later than Friday, September 11th at 6 PM. (You can also post your response in the comments thread, but a blog entry is better. )
  2. Please mention the Weekend Assignment in your blog post, and include a link back to this entry.
  3. Please come back here after you've posted, and leave a link to your entry in the comments below.
  4. Visiting other participants' entries is strongly encouraged!
  5. I'm always looking for topic ideas. Please email me at mavarin2 on gmail.com if there's a Weekend Assignment theme you'd like to see. If I use your idea, you will be credited as that week's "guest professor."

That's it! Simple, huh? I look forward to shearing about your big-spending adventures. Meanwhile, look for my Round Robin entry in a few hours.

Karen

Friday, August 28, 2009

Weekend Assignment # 282: I CAN HAZ LOLCATS?

Last week I showed two offline friends my "I CAN HAZ HEALTHCARE" poster, and ended up having to explain about LOLcats and what "can haz" means. That little cultural divide inspires this week's Weekend Assignment:

Weekend Assignment: #281: Create a LOLcat (or a LOLdog, or a LOLpig, a LOLhorse or whatever). If you can do it with your own pet photo, great (I'm looking at YOU, Sara and Sarah), but alternatively you can just describe what it would look like. Don't forget the humorous caption! Here's a "lolbuilder" to help you out.
Extra Credit: Do you like "lolspeak" and other Internet slang, or mostly find it annoying?

[Update #1: I have been taken to task for not explaining about lolcats and the language thereof, for those of you who may not have made it to those areas of "teh interwebs." Here's a quick glossary:

  • LOLcats - funny pictures of cats doing cute things, posted online, usually captioned in a peculiar form of internet slang known as "lolspeak," a humorous mangling of English inspired by the accidental wackiness of "Engrish." From LOL = laughing out loud + cats. The motherlode of such things is on the website I Can Has Cheezburger? Of particular interest are Ceiling Cat (a cat peeking down from ceiling tiles, with spinoff pics and a mock-religious following), Helmet Cat (a cat wearing a helmet made of melon rind, or possibly a hollowed out lime) and Bacon Cat (John Scalzi's cat, Ghlaghghee, with bacon taped to her side). Unsurprisingly, I prefer LOLdogs myself
  • I CAN HAZ (or I Can Has) = May I have (a)....
  • OH HAI - Oh, hi! (as in being nonchalant after being caught in the act)
  • MAI = my
  • UR = your. Most often found in the construction "I'M IN UR ____, _____ING UR _____." An example would be a cat looking at a Webster's, captioned, "I'M IN UR DICKSHUNARY, SPEELIN UR WERDZ."
  • KTHXBAI (and variants) = okay, thanks, bye!
  • KITTEHS = kittens or cats
  • TEH = the
For more, check out the various internet slang dictionaries, decoders and guides as well as lolcat websites. You can also get your very own lolname at lolinator.com. (Mine is apparently "Kernel Snookums," which doesn't suit me at all.) There is even a project to translate the entire Bible into lolspeak. This begins,

Genesis 1: Boreded Ceiling Cat makinkgz Urf n stuffs

1 Oh hai. In teh beginnin Ceiling Cat maded teh skiez An da Urfs, but he did not eated dem.

2 Da Urfs no had shapez An haded dark face, An Ceiling Cat rode invisible bike over teh waterz.

There is much more to this subject, but that's enough to give the uninitiated a taste of what we're discussing and replicating here.]

[Update #2: for those of you with no easy way to come up with pictures of your own to caption, here are three of mine you can use in your entry. Click on a picture to get to my relevant Picasa gallery, where you can find more pictures to use. Please add "Photo by KFB. Some rights reserved." to any photo of mine you post on your own blog, k? Thx bye!

Photo by KFB. Some rights reserved.
From the Picasa album Hermitage No-Kill Shelter


Photo by KFB. Some rights reserved.
From the Picasa album Hermitage No-Kill Shelter


Photo by KFB. Some rights reserved.
From the Picasa album Trouble Dogs

end of Update #2]

My own answer is also my response to Carly's Ellipsis Monday Photo Shoot for this week, which calls for pictures of laundry. My photos are technically rather crummy this time out, but they'll do:








I'm strongly ambivalent about Netspeak in general, and the spelling and grammar of lolcats in particular. There are enough assaults on correct written English as it is, with the online and offline worlds both rife with sloppy punctuation, and a generation (at least) more comfortable with the abbreviations of texting and Twitter than the actual words from which they spring. My allegiance is with real English, as taught in school and promulgated in books - well, most books. When I try to use the lolcat patois, I find it difficult to make myself misspell a word, even for humorous effect. Yet at the same time, I'm fascinated by the very existence of this odd dialect. Why "can haz?" Why "hai" instead of hi? What are teh rulz of the language of kittehs? Is there somewhere I can take a course in it? (Answer: iz here.) If I did, would I do better in it that I did in my French lit course? I doubt it! So I guess I'll struggle along with my hybridized English and lolspeak as needed.

How about you? If you have a camera, catch your pet (or in a pinch, your human) doing something interesting, photograph it, and add a funny caption - spelling optional. Post the result in your blog, along with your comments about Internet slang, and please, please include a link back to this entry. I'll be back next Friday with a roundup of your responses. Like this!

For Weekend Assignment #281: Writers or Actors?, I asked whether you pay more attention to actors or the behind-the-camera talent (writers, producers and directors) when deciding whether to watch a film of tv show. We had a good turnout this week, so let's get right to the excerpts from your responses:

New participant (and veteran Leaper) Jo said in comments...

Hi Karen,
Scott Bakula is definitely my favorite actor as well as one of the nicest people I know so yes, I'll watch almost anything he's in. Even saw Lord of Illusions although I hated that one. Not my cup of tea. But some movies I'll watch because I've read the book. The Time Traveler's Wife was one of those and so are the Harry Potter movies. I'll usually go to a Pixar or Disney movie because they do quality stuff - UP was one of those - although Monsters vs Aliens stunk.

Guess I have to say except for Scott, it's the subject matter that draws me into a movie, not the actor. TV - it's the writing definitely. That's first. If it's not well written, I don't stick around to see how good the actors are - usually.

Duane said...

Aren't they both important? Doesn't one group complement the other? I'd lean toward the writers, producers and directors, but my set of favorites would be small. The actors would influence my decision, but the material, the kind of movie or show it is would influence me the most. I'd rather see Kevin Costner in Dances with Wolves than The Bodyguard.

Florinda said...

Given that answer to the extra-credit question, it seems like my answer to the first question would be the "behind the scenes" people...and if I think about it a little more, that's probably right. Since I spend most of my non-watching time reading, it makes sense that I would have an affinity for the people who create the premises, develop the settings and themes, and put the words in the characters' mouths. The actors bring those characters and words to life, and when the part is cast just right - when you truly can't imagine someone else in the role - they're integral to the project. But without the writers, producers, and directors - who sometimes overlap in two or even three of those roles - there would be no project in the first place.

New participant Amy (welcome, Amy!) said...

The truth is, the writers, producers, and/or directors probably have the most consistent impact. While I am definitely attached to certain actors and actresses, when I hear a certain creative mind is behind a project I am automatically curious. This is especially true for television. For me, the name Joss Whedon inspires ridiculous loyalty. J.J. Abrams, Rob Thomas, Eric Kripke, Howard Gordon, David Fury, Jane Espenson, Damon Lindelof, Carlton Cuse, Tim Minear, Bryan Fuller....all those names will make me take notice.

Mike said...

I am leaning towards the writers and directors. As Karen says, they bring the idea to the show or movie. They create the world, the characters and most everything about a movie. Without them you would have people walking around and making stuff up the whole time. It would be the world's worst improv session.

That's it for tonight! Many thanks to Jo, Florinda, Amy and Mike for their help this week. If you're reading this (and you are), I hope you'll follow their example, and jump in with your own Weekend Assignment entry. Here are the guidelines if you'd like to participate:

  1. Please post your entry no later than Friday, September 4th at 6 PM. (You can also post your response in the comments thread, but a blog entry is better. )
  2. Please mention the Weekend Assignment in your blog post, and include a link back to this entry.
  3. Please come back here after you've posted, and leave a link to your entry in the comments below.
  4. Visiting other participants' entries is strongly encouraged!
  5. I'm always looking for topic ideas. Please email me at mavarin2 on gmail.com if there's a Weekend Assignment theme you'd like to see. If I use your idea, you will be credited as that week's "guest professor."

That's it! Simple, huh? I look forward to seeing your lolpix!

Karen

Sunday, August 17, 2008

A Home for LOL Dogs

Well, I just spent the whole day (read: since getting up late this afternoon) on a silly Internet project. Then again, isn't that what I usually do on weekends?

After last night's jester graphics, I thought it would be nice to have a page for some of my fun graphics - not the ones based on my own face or Doctor Who (although that could be interesting), but on the captioned dog pictures I've done over the past year or so. I now present:

I'm the dog! (Cayenne to Pepper)
Ireland (later renamed Cayenne) in the yard
with Pepper for the first time, August 2, 2008.


As I explain on the page, I'm not very good with the whole "I can haz" patois, so these graphics mostly don't do that. And you've seen most of them before on this blog, although not all. Newly-created, or at least newly-enhanced, are the ones in tonight's blog entry.

Best friends...until there is food. (Pepper and Cayenne)

Cayenne to Pepper: Let's play!
It's not an easy relationship, but they're working on it!
Pepper and Cayenne, August 2008.

Pepper is just the little sleepy dog. Trust her.
Don't bet on it! Pepper, August 2008

Pepper isn't so sure she likes Cayenne's antics.
Cayenne takes liberties. August 2008.

Fun stuff!

While I was at it, I moved every file on mavarin.com that had "tuf," "pepr," "jenn," "nood" or "dogs" in the name into a new dogs subdirectory. It occurred to me only belatedly that this messed up lots of blog entries, especially in Musings from Mâvarin, which mostly has files stored on my personal web site. I went back through and fixed a lot of broken graphics, but I'd appreciate it if you'll let me know about ones that I've missed. Okay? Thanks! I expect there are a bunch in the early days of the Outpost, which I'll try to get to tomorrow.

Karen

Thursday, July 12, 2007

Tuffy Can Haz Loldog Thx

Weekend Assignment #174: Humiliate your pet! Show a picture or tell a story that features your pet doing something that's goofy or silly, even for dumb animal.

I added the following to last night's entry just five minutes ago! Now I'm moving it as the seed for tonight's Weekend Assignment entry. Synchronicity rulz!


This blog is 99% cat free.

I'm not entirely comfortable with lolcats (especially the spelling and syntax), but after enjoying some "Sclolzis" on Scalzi's Whatever and being told by a Robin to get a cat (never, never, never, sorry) I was moved to make this. You don't want to make me wheeze and scare my dog, do you? No, it wouldn't be my inability to breathe that would freak Tuffy out. It would be the cats. Scary, scary cats. Or is that just me? I don't know for a fact that she'd be scared, because I don't think she's met a cat in eight or nine years. But she's nervous around people, dogs, cardboard boxes, and anything else that moves or makes noise, so it's a pretty safe bet.

More later, probably.


Tuffy came in out of the rain.

Okay, later is here. It rained this afternoon, and Tuffy went out in it. She was inside when John and I got home (we happened to arrive at the same time), but her fur was wet. She willingly went back out for me so I could get a picture of her. Tuffy will do pretty much anything for attention and food, as long as she knows what I want and it's not too scary.

Karen