Showing posts with label Star Trek. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Star Trek. Show all posts

Saturday, May 09, 2009

Reasonably Spoiler-Free Star Trek Review

Well, it was very good indeed. Star Trek (no handy subtitle to distinguish it from other Trek offerings) was a classy, well-executed reboot of the Star Trek saga, tossing away nothing and yet starting fresh - a neat trick if you can do it.

Here's a completely superficial look at the premise of the film: there's a time travel thing, and a Romulan attacks a starship. Jim Kirk is born, has a wild youth and is recruited to the academy. The Romulan attacks again, and Kirk ends up on the brand new starship Enterprise. He finishes meeting the other main characters, except for Scotty whom he then meets elsewhere. They save the day, but a rather big thing has already happened that will probably shock most Star Trek fans.

The casting was pretty much spot on, although I have minor reservations about Simon Pegg as Scotty. His performance was fine, and he looked very different from his guest role in Doctor Who (the Editor in "The Long Game"), but he didn't quite manage to look like he could be young Montgomery Scott. (He did well vocally, though.) Zachary Quinto (Sylar on Heroes) is visually perfect as young Spock, although I'm not sure he quite manages to give the challenging role enough gravitas. (There are also at least two scenes in which Spock goes well outside his old parameters, which will raise more than a few eyebrows.) Chris Pine as Kirk and Karl Urban as McCoy are particularly good. Pat, you'd appreciate how well Urban captures De Kelley's spirit for the role. Pine is not much like William Shatner, and yet he's very Jim Kirk. This Uhura is smart and sexy, Sulu gets to swordfight, and Chekov is a young techno geek. We even get to see Kirk's predecsssor, Christopher Pike, extremely well played by Bruce Greenwood. Some of these characters get more development in this film than in years of television episodes, which is all to the good. I disliked a brief sequence in which the teenage Kirk is a very bad boy, but other than that I believe wholeheartedly in the film's new look at these familiar characters.

As for the plot, it sort of makes sense, much more so than some of the previous Star Trek films. The antagonist is a vengeful Romulan in a horrific, spiky starship, more reminiscent of Babylon 5's Shadows than the old Romulan Bird of Prey design. Although he is defeated at the end of the film, he first accomplishes some terrible things, including the destruction of a planet we care about and the death of a major recurring character. There is no reset button, and the damage stays done at the end of the film, a disturbing turn of events akin to the destruction of Gellifrey in the 2005 revival of Doctor Who.

The result of all this is a clearing away of much of Star Trek's accretion of continuity, and yet most of the basics remain. Kirk is still a bit of a womanizer, with a genius for improvisation and a healthy disrespect for the rules. McCoy is still "a doctor, not a..." and can tell you exactly why did doesn't like transporter beams. There are lots of familiar names of people and places and starships, bits of recycled dialogue to annoy or warm the hearts of longtime fans (perhaps both), space battles, cool effects and soaring, bombastic music.

I can't judge how this film would go over with someone unfamiliar with the old show, but as a fan, I'm hard pressed to see how the film could be much better. Once I accept the cataclysmic events and their effect on the show's continuity (and you know me, I'm a continuity junkie from way back), I can admire how well J J Abrams has refitted my first favorite show for a new round of adventures.

Karen

Friday, May 08, 2009

Weekend Assignment #266 : TV That Mattered

My plans for the day bring last-minute inspiration for this week's topic:

Weekend Assignment #266: The release of the blockbuster Star Trek prequel movie reboots a franchise for a cult tv show that had a huge impact on generations of sf tv viewers. Is there a tv series from your youth that you remember especially fondly?

Extra Credit: Have you bought the aforementioned tv series on DVD? If not, would you if it were readily available at a reasonable price?



Oh, no! I'm a redshirt!


It was probably in 1975 that a report (or rumor) reached my local Star Trek club, STAR Syracuse, that a Star Trek movie was being planned. Problem was, according to our information, that Paramount's plans for it were basically a sacrilege to our way of thinking. They wanted to recast the roles of Kirk, Spock, etc., with younger, prettier, more famous actors. We were furious! We wrote to Paramount in protest, insisting that only Shatner and Nimoy could be Kirk and Spock! Only DeForest Kelley could be Bones McCoy!

Heh. How times change!



My interactions with the Enterprise have been mostly benign.


I probably only saw a few Star Trek episodes on NBC when they first aired in 1966-1969. This wasn't due to a lack of interest. It's just that it was on after my bedtime. I specifically remember sitting quietly in the living room, hoping my dad wouldn't notice and send me to bed as the amnesiac Kirk fell in love with Miramanee. He probably knew exactly wat was going on, but took pity on me because I was clearly desperate to see the rest of the episode, and since it was Friday night I didn't have to get up for school in the morning.

But I don't think I got to see any more Star Trek until Channel 9 started airing the syndicated reruns around 1972 or 1973. I became so thoroughly hooked on that show that I ordered film clips out of the Lincoln Enterprises catalogs, started a Mary Sue story in which Joel R. and I save the Enterprise, bought all the James Blish story adaptations and other, better Star Trek books, and practically got the shakes if I wasn't in front of the tv at 5 PM on a weekday. By 1974 I was in STAR Syracuse, and editing its fanzine, which I'd founded before joining the club. It was called 2-5YM, which stood for "Second Five-Year Mission." We were always trying to come up with ways to convince Paramount and NBC to put the show back on the air.

Even so, I'm not sure I actually ever believed that Star Trek would return to tv. I certainly didn't anticipate multiple spinoffs with other starships (and one space station) and their crews, all the good, bad and ugly films, metric tons of merchandising, and a husband who once spent - well, I probably shouldn't reveal the amount, but it was impressive - on classic Star Trek merchandise in a single day at a Star Trek convention.

I've long since moved on in my video affections, to Doctor Who and Quantum Leap and Buffy the Vampire Slayer, but Star Trek still has the power to occasionally fill me with nostalgic joy or even, as today, anticipatory excitement. Yes, we have the series and the animated series on DVD, and a few of them on the old laserdisc format. And I'm really looking forward to seeing the new movie this afternoon, in a digital projection presentation instead of on film, and starring a younger, prettier cast as Kirk and Spock and Bones.

How about you? Were you a Trekkie, or was Masters of the Universe or The Muppet Show your childhood fave? Whether SF, cartoon, cop show or comedy, there is for most of us some show that meant a lot to us as kids. Pick one and tell us about it! Write it up in your blog, and please remember to include a link back to this entry. Then leave a link to your entry in the comments below. I'll be back in a week with the results. Here, meanwhile, is last week's results:

For Weekend Assignment #265: Darn Computer!, I asked you for some computer horror stories, and to consider the Mac vs. Windows issue.

Astaryth said in comments...

That software that comes with your camera (especially point and shoot ones) is hardly ever either good or a necessity. In the 'old days' when you had to plug the camera in... maybe, but now days everything goes on a card which can be removed, stuck in a reader and moved like any other file onto a folder on your computer. ;p It's probably that stuff causing your problem. Good luck getting it all going. Worst case... you -could- just reformat the whole computer...

Julie said...

Karen is right: I'm always battling something. But that's life on the bleeding edge of computing. Someone gets cut, and it's generally me. Why, just this week the enclosure that houses my backup hard drive died. That got replaced today, and I'm doing a backup in preparation for installing the release candidate of Windows 7.

Florinda said...

My worst computer disaster happened at work a few years ago - a fried hard drive. I didn't lose a lot of work, since all of my files are on our network server, but I did lose a lot of time. We didn't have in-house tech support at that time (don't get me started - fortunately, it's no longer true), and it was at least two days before the problem was resolved. I did get an unexpected vacation day, though - I got my boss to agree that there was no point to my coming in to the office if I couldn't DO anything. (That wouldn't happen now, but I would try to get a work-from-home day. At times, those are almost as good as a day off.).

Mike said...

I haven't had any major problems with computers, but I have had my share of issues. The most recent was with our last computer. I won't mention the brand name, but it rhymes with "Bell." We had the computer for just over a year, so the warranty was over, and all of a sudden, I couldn't turn it off. Yes, I said off. It was the weirdest thing. I played around with it for a while, then, of course, I couldn't turn it on. Not good.

I'm still dangerously low on "guest professor" suggestions for these Weekend Assignments, so I ask again: please, please, please, PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE email me some new ones. I warn you, I will continue adding another please to the previous sentence each week until someone suggests something. Save us from the invasion of the pleases! (And no, Mike, psychic contributions don't count.)

Karen

Sunday, October 12, 2008

Patterns of Force: Has McCain Lost Control?

There's an episode of the original series of Star Trek called "Patterns of Force." It's not in the upper echelon of good Star Trek stories, but rather one of Gene Roddenberry's sometimes awkward attempts at social commentary. But that's not important right now. The premise was this: the Enterprise finds a missing historian on a planet that's literally turned into a planet of Nazis, complete with SS and Gestapo, bent on exterminating the rather peaceful inhabitants of the next planet over. The historian, John Gill, tried to solve the planet's problems by setting up an "efficient" government modeled on Nazi Germany, setting himself up as Fuhrer, the better to guide and help them. Gill left out the religious/ethnic scapegoating from his recreation, but the Deputy Fuhrer rectified this omission when he took over behind the scenes. By the time Kirk and Co. arrive, Gill is a figurehead, a drugged up talking head manipulated by the hatemongers in his government.

There's also at least one Doctor Who story (Vengeance on Varos, perhaps?) with a similar dynamic, the apparent leader of a totalitarian regime who is actually just another victim of the vicious people pulling his strings.

Now, I don't mean to remotely imply that there is a close parallel with either of these stories in current American politics. But as I ponder recent developments at the rallies of John McCain and Sarah Palin, I find myself wondering how much control McCain is exerting over his own campaign. Does he really "approve this message" when an ad strays far from factual territory into character assassination? Does he approve Palin's attempts to paint Barack Obama as the scary unAmerican, one of Them, possibly a terrorist himself (although Palin never quite says this)? Does he approve of supporters' yells - unanswered until Friday - that Obama is a traitor and a terrorist, so "off with his head"?

For most of this week, it looked as though McCain approved all of the above, or at least didn't object enough to say anything to the contrary. Then on Friday, he finally said something. When McCain volunteer Gayle Quinnell, called Obama "an Arab," McCain said, "No, ma'am. He's a decent family man, citizen that I just happen to have disagreements with on fundamental issues."

Reports differ on whether Quinnell called him an Arab or an Arab terrorist; the microphone only picked up "Arab" as McCain took the mike from her. But he knew what she meant. After all, the emails and other extremist hatemongering propaganda about Obama being a secret Muslim terrorist, possibly even the Antichrist, have been making the rounds for quite some time. McCain did not refute the idea that an "Arab" is inherently evil; he merely asserted that Obama is a "decent family man" and a "citizen." At another point in the rally he assured a father-to-be that he did not need to be afraid of an Obama presidency. For these reasonable, truthful remarks amid the attacks on Obama's character, McCain was booed by the crowd.

Nor was Quinnell herself convinced by McCain's attempt to defuse the paranoid hatemongering. Afterward she told reporters that she had been mailing out "information" about Obama as a Muslim terrorist at her own expense to hundreds of people randomly selected in the phone book.

Noah Kunin: You called him an Arab terrorist? Is that correct? Why do you think he is an Arab?

Quinnell Because his dad is. If you… I’ll send you the paper.

Female reporter: His dad is Muslim. His dad was Muslim. Barack Obama has never been a Muslim.

Quinnell: No but he’s….

Dana Bash of CNN: He’s a Christian.

Quinnell: He’s not an Arab either, he’s a--

Bash: His father was Muslim, and he’s a Christian.

Quinnell: Yeah , but he’s still got Muslim in him. So that’s still part of him. I got all the stuff from the library and I could send you all kinds of stuff on him. In fact….

Bash: What did you think about McCain said? He said he’s a decent person.

Quinnell: Well he did have didn’t have (unintelligible) I think McCain wanted to (unintelligible) I don’t think he wanted to say anything against him. You know he didn’t want to cut him down. That was my way of thinking. I don’t think he wanted to cut him down. So he just kind of brushed me off.

Reporter: Plus he criticizes Barack Obama plenty himself, so why wouldn’t he do it now?

Quinnell: Well I probably brought up something that he didn’t want to talk about.

Reporter: Do you think John McCain thinks that he’s Arab? Do you think he knows this stuff that you’re saying you know is fact?

Quinnell: I don’t know. I don’t know. Maybe he doesn’t want to bring it up then. I don’t know why. Is there some way I can get to you more information?

As deluded xenophobes continued to spread lies about Obama beyond what McCain himself would condone, Obama himself called for an end to the divisiveness without directly criticizing the scary people who called for Obama's blood:

"In the last couple of days we have seen a barrage of nasty insinuations and attacks and I am sure we will see much more over the next 25 days.... It's easy to rile up a crowd by stoking anger and division. But that is not what we need now in the United States, the times are too serious."

He also said,
“I want to acknowledge that Sen. McCain tried to tone down the rhetoric yesterday, and I appreciated his reminder that we can disagree while still being respectful of each other,” he said at a rally in north Philadelphia. McCain, he said, “has served this country with honor and he deserves our thanks for that.”

And the McCain camp's response to Obama's rather mild rebuke?

“Barack Obama’s assault on our supporters is insulting and unsurprising,” McCain senior adviser Nicolle Wallace said in a statement, “These are the same people Obama called ‘bitter’ and attacked for ‘clinging to guns’ and faith. He fails to understand that people are angry at corrupt practices in Washington and Wall Street and he fails to understand that America’s working families are not ‘clinging’ to anything other than the sincere hope that Washington will be reformed from top to bottom.”

A McCain spokesman also attacked Obama. “Barack Obama’s attacks on Americans who support John McCain reveal far more about him than they do about John McCain. It is clear that Barack Obama just doesn’t understand regular people and the issues they care about,” said Brian Rogers.

Somehow I don't think that's going to dial down the hate and paranoia on the part of supporters.

So the question remains: is John McCain in control of his campaign at this point? He seems to have attempted a measure of it on Friday, but failed to keep either his campaign staff or his supporters from undercutting his words. At this point I have no idea whether any portion of the old image of McCain as an honorable man was ever true but I'd like to think that the spark of decency she showed on Friday was genuine. He needs to fan that flame, and use it to combat the very different fires being set in his name.

Karen

Friday, January 05, 2007

That Other New York

Weekend Assignment #146: New York -- America's largest and most important city. What are your thoughts about it? We're not all from New York, of course, but the city looms large in our collective consciousness. It's that whole "if you can make it there" thing. So share some of your thoughts about New York, whether it's an opinion about the city, a memory of a visit there, a screed on why you hate it and everything it stands for (if you're a Red Sox fan) -- anything, as long as New York, New York is the subject.

Extra Credit:
New York Yankees: Love em or hate em?



I don't have a single photo taken in New York City, but here are a couple of purchases I made there, over thirty years ago. Yes, of course there's a story behind them.

The blue trade paperback of Thurber's Dogs was one of two Thurber books I bought on my "senior trip" to New York City in 1973 or 1974. I was actually a high school junior at the time, but the school let a few juniors come along to fill out the roster. Good thing, too, because they didn't organize a senior trip to New York when I was actually a senior.

It was a great trip - not always pleasant or interesting, but perversely interesting even when things got a little boring or unpleasant. We stayed at a run down hotel somewhere near Lincoln Center; it hay have been called Hotel Lincoln Square or something like that. The image that sticks in my memory is that someone had painted the ceiling and fixtures white - including the bare lightbulb in the overhead light.

In case you're wondering, Manlius was about a five or six hour drive from New York, down the New York State Thruway. Or you could take the train from East Syracuse - which we did.

The trip's chaperons were members of the English and Music departments at Fayetteville-Manlius High School‎, so naturally there was a lot of culture on the itinerary. We saw The Tempest (one of my three favorite Shakespeare plays) at Lincoln Center, with young Carol Kane, fresh from her Dr. Pepper commercial, as Miranda. We visited the Metropolitan Museum of Art, and The Cloisters, the place with the Unicorn Tapestries. We visited Grand Central Station (the train from Syracuse went into Penn Station), went up the elevator in one of the towers of the World Trade Center, and walked through Central Park. We saw Carol Channing as Lorelei in Lorelei, a Broadway sequel to Gentlemen Prefer Blondes. We all agreed (including and especially the teachers) that it was terrible, Channing at her past-her-prime worst.

Back at Lincoln Center, we trooped up to the balcony, or possibly the mezzanine, to see Madame Butterfly. And here is where the books come in: Thurber's Dogs and the other book I bought that day, Thurber Country. Truth is, I hated Madame Butterfly. I didn't understand the language, didn't care for the music, and thought Butterfly was a pathetic victim who should have stood up for herself and gotten on with her life. Rather than pay full attention to something that bored and annoyed me so much, I sat in the balcony and squinted at Thurber's Dogs in the darkened Metropolitan Opera House. All these years later, that still amuses me. I don't regret it one bit.

That wasn't my first trip to New York City, or my last, but it was one of the most memorable. I'd previously been to the City a few times with my family when I was much younger, but all I remember from that was standing outside a hotel where my maternal grandmother was staying. My dad's family lived over in Little Ferry and Denville, New Jersey, but I think we pretty much bypassed Manhattan when we went to Jersey.

The other really memorable trip to NYC was in February, 1975, when several members of STAR Syracuse took the train down to the second-ever (or thereabouts) Star Trek Convention, held at the Commodore Hotel adjacent to Grand Central. For three days I practically lived on hot donuts I'd watched being fried, right around the corner from where the hotel emptied into the train station. (This was before my digestive system started punishing me for every donut I ate.) I met David Gerrold, who was one of my favorite writers at the time, and was kissed by Isaac Asimov, apparently one of his favorite activities at conventions at the time. I had chosen to praise his TV Guide articles to distinguish myself from the crowd. I think that amused him.

During that trip I made one solo journey away from the hotel and station to go see John Wood in William Gillette's play Sherlock Holmes. Foolishly, I carried my plastic bag from the Star Trek convention with faces of the cast on it, and I went alone: young, innocent and completely unarmed. I took a cab down, confidently asking the driver for "the Broadhurst Theater, please," only to be asked for the address. The play was a lot of fun, but I had a little trouble hearing the dialogue from the mezzanine. On the way back, I couldn't find a cab, because I needed to be one block over and didn't know it. So I took the subway back. The worst thing that happened was that a few people kindly berated me for taking chances, taking the subway alone like that. But it made me feel good, because people were actually looking out for me, a stranger, rather than trying to rip me off.

There was a moment, on that trip or the previous one, when someone tried to grab my purse in front of a store. They didn't get it. I held on too hard, and the guy kept going.

It was on this Star Trek trip that Chris D. and I saw the 59th Street Bridge, immortalized by Simon and Garfunkel, and that I bought The Wonderful O. On the train ride back, I amused Chris by reading passages from the Thurber fairy tale, so rich in wordplay:

"I don't like it, I don't like it," squawked the parrot, and Black squcked his thrug till all he could whipple was geep.

"Geep," whuppled the parrot.



It's fitting that I should remember New York City fondly in connection with books and writers. New York is the center of the publishing world, at least in the United States. Most of the major publishing houses are based there, although some of them are owned by overseas conglomerates these days. James Thurber worked for The New Yorker for many years. Madeleine L'Engle was born in NYC and lived there at least part time as an adult. And of course John Scalzi is there now, conducting business with his editors and publishers. Someday I hope to do the same, perhaps in the very same building. To that end, I sent off my follow-up letter to Tor today, in preparation for which I wasted an envelope, sending it through my printer-scanner twice to determine the right way to insert it. Answer: face up, with the flap underneath to the left.

Come to think of it, I did once meet with my editor and publisher in New York City - somewhere in the vicinity, anyway. Les and Toni from Relix Magazine, which published my first professional articles, took John and me to lunch in Chinatown in 1981.

You may have noticed that I'm careful to always say New York City or NYC, never simply New York. Growing up in Manlius NY and later attending college in Syracuse, I was painfully aware that vast numbers of Americans, including people from New York City and environs, assume that "New York" consists of the five boroughs, or just Manhattan, or, at most, a metropolitan area that includes places like New Rochelle, but nothing much farther than that. Syracuse, located smack dab in the middle of the state of New York, at the crossroads of I-90 (the Thruway) and Interstate Route 81, is dismissively referred to as "Upstate." No, no, no. Upstate is Watertown. Syracuse and Manlius are in Central New York. I'll never win that battle, but I'll never stop trying, either.

Still, aside from the nomenclature problem, I quite like New York City, and would gladly go there again. And maybe I will.

As for the Yankees, I don't actually have strong feelings about them one way or another. I kinda lie Joe Torre, and the Yankees are certainly rich in baseball history. But I don't care. The Diamondbacks beat them that one glorious year. That's good enough for me.

Karen

Technorati Tags: , , , ,